Date:
Wed, 29/03/202311:30-13:00
Title: p-points and their opposites
Abstract:
An ultrafilter U on omega (the natural numbers) is a p-point if
for every family (A_n: n in omega) of elements of U there is a
pseudointersection B in U, i.e. a set B which is almost contained
in every A_n ( B minus A_n is finite).
It is known that CH implies that p-points exist, and that
"there are no p-points" is consistent with ZFC.
If U is an ultrafilter on X, V an ultrafilter on Y,
we say that V is a Rudin-Keisler quotient of U if there is
a function f: X -> Y such that V = { B: f^-1[B] in U }.
I will review these concepts, explain the p-point game,
and sketch a construction of Shelah that yields an ultrafilter
without any Rudin-Keisler p-point quotient. I will also
talk briefly about work in progress: the construction of
a set-theoretic universe in which no p-points exist, yet
there is an ultrafilter generated by aleph1 many sets.
Abstract:
An ultrafilter U on omega (the natural numbers) is a p-point if
for every family (A_n: n in omega) of elements of U there is a
pseudointersection B in U, i.e. a set B which is almost contained
in every A_n ( B minus A_n is finite).
It is known that CH implies that p-points exist, and that
"there are no p-points" is consistent with ZFC.
If U is an ultrafilter on X, V an ultrafilter on Y,
we say that V is a Rudin-Keisler quotient of U if there is
a function f: X -> Y such that V = { B: f^-1[B] in U }.
I will review these concepts, explain the p-point game,
and sketch a construction of Shelah that yields an ultrafilter
without any Rudin-Keisler p-point quotient. I will also
talk briefly about work in progress: the construction of
a set-theoretic universe in which no p-points exist, yet
there is an ultrafilter generated by aleph1 many sets.